I spoke with a man from the Jordan Evangelical Theological Seminary (JETS) the other day and he told me a story about one of the Sudanese pastors he worked with about the persecution of the Christian Church in Sudan. It got me thinking. While international attention on Africa has finally been drawn to the atrocious genocide of the native Sudanese people, as I have commented on prior, attention has been focused primarily on the bloody genocide in Darfur. Yet while media attention is focused to the west, a deeply-rooted religious partition has continuously divided the Islamic north and Christian south with much more deadly, yet less recognized, implications.
“Government soldiers came into the village [located] in the Nuba Mountains, a significant bridge between north and south, and burned all the Christian homes, burned the churches, and demanded the pastor denounce Christ,” Daffron said. “In front of the whole village they removed a finger each time they asked and he wouldn’t renounce. Then they dragged him behind a van through the village.”
Daffron believes that only by the grace of God was the life of this pastor spared, to spread a message, not of retaliation, but of hope.
The atrocious genocide of the native Sudanese people in Darfur, a region the size of France in western Sudan, has taken the lives of an estimated 200,000 to 400,000 since the most recent uprising in 2003. Yet while this uprising is the most recent and prevalent, it is one political conflict within a deeply seeded religious civil war between the minority Islamic Arab population and ruling party in the north and the majority native Christian Sudanese population in the south. A religious civil war that has taken the lives of over 2.2 million people in the past 50 years.
The minority Islamic Arab ruling party in the north, and the majority native Christian Sudanese population in the south, have stained the sand of the Sahara over border conflicts, oil revenue and humanitarian aid, for the extent of the country’s independent history.
The conflict is complex with multiple key parties and, even more, angry players. But while it is a political conflict between the National Congress Party, Sudan’s Arab ruling party of the north, and the “Rebel” liberation parties in the south, it is a political conflict with deep religious roots.
Cliff Daffron sees the root of the conflict as “one of an Islamic Arab-led government imposing Islam and all of its systems on the south and the Christian people.”
An Islamic North against a Christian South.
“Islam is not just a religion but a social, political and economic system,” Daffron said.
He said he has seen the Muslim population impose Islam within all aspects of society from banks to school curriculum on the Christian people.
I also spoke with another man directly involved in fighting within the war zone of Sudan. Reverend Sam Childers has lived in the bush of Sudan for 11 years and founded an orphanage in south Sudan for children orphaned by the war. He fights on the front line as a third entity for these children before they are displaced or either side can recruit them as soldiers.
Childers is pessimistic that the hybrid United Nations and African Union peacekeeping mission to be deployed sometime before Jan 1 will succeed due to the harsh ethnic and religious partition. He believes the mission will consist of primarily Muslim peacekeepers whose deep-seeded religious bias will detract from a fair protection of the native Christian population.
He also attributed his pessimism to the fact that a peacekeeping mission is to “keep” peace, a peace that cannot currently be found in the country of Sudan.
This conflict is between an Islamic north against a Christian south that has been overshadowed by strong political language that the west is used to using to describe civil conflict. Unfortunately until the international community recognizes the religious aspect of this conflict peace efforts will not address the true conflict and therefore not be successful.
Cliff Daffron left me with this to ponder, which I leave you with.
“I’m all behind [the peacekeeping troops] to stop the slaughter, but that is an external peace, imposed on the country,” Daffron said. “It’s not an internal peace, and that’s what is needed.”